Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer

2002 Total Population Estimates for Texas Counties

Estimates of the Total Populations of Counties and Places in Texas for July 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003

From

The Texas State Data Center
The Texas State Population Estimates and Projections Program

Prepared by

Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research
The University of Texas at San Antonio

October 2003


The attached are estimates of the total population for counties and places in Texas for July 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003 completed by personnel from the Texas State Data Center offices in the Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research at the University of Texas at San Antonio. In this brief report, the methodology used to prepare the estimates is described. Because of space limitations, only a summary of the methodology is presented. Those wishing to obtain a more complete description of the estimation procedures and of the historical and sensitivity analyses used to select the methods employed in these estimates should contact program personnel in the Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research at the University of Texas at San Antonio.


Estimation Methodology

Methodology for County Estimates

The estimates reported here for counties are the averages of estimates made using ratio-correlation, component-method II, and housing-unit methods. Ratio-correlation procedures utilize multiple regression techniques with the ratio of variable values for adjacent time periods rather than simply the variable values themselves being used as independent and dependent variables. After an extensive evaluation of the relative accuracy of alternative procedures (including difference-rate, ratio-correlation and rate-correlation methods) and an analysis of alternative variables, a simple ratio-correlation model was employed to complete the final estimates. This model used the variables of births, deaths, elementary school enrollment, vehicle registration, and voter registration.

The component-method II procedure employed utilizes data on births, deaths and elementary school enrollment to estimate population. In this method, migration of the school-age population is assumed to be indicative of migration in the total population (with adjustments being made for the historical differences between the school-age migration rate and the total population's rate of migration). Data on public school enrollment from the Texas Education Agency and data from the Texas State Data Center's survey of private schools in Texas are used to estimate change in the school-age population. Data on institutional populations were obtained from applicable institutions, while data on other special populations, such as the elderly population were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census.

The housing-unit method used is of the standard form with change in the number of housing units in the housing stock of an area, from the base date (in this case, the 2000 Census) to the estimate date (in this case, July 1, 2002), being used to estimate population change. New housing additions and demolitions are taken from the U.S. Bureau of the Census survey of building permits and demolitions and the Texas State Data Center survey of counties and cities issuing permits for residential buildings and demolitions. Both the U.S. Census Bureau's building permit survey and the Texas State Data Center's survey can only collect data from permit issuing county and city jurisdictions (methods for dealing with non-permit issuing places are discussed later). Assumptions about vacancy rates and average household size are then used in conjunction with data on the number of housing units in an estimate area (including those in the area at the base date and the net number of units added to, or subtracted from, the base housing stock for the time period between the base date and the estimate date). Separate estimates are completed by type of structure with the types used being single-family structures, 2-to-4 unit structures, structures with 5 or more units, and mobile homes. For purposes of the 2002 estimates, 2000 vacancy rates and average household sizes for each of the housing structure types were assumed to prevail as of the estimate date of July 1, 2002. For 2002, the estimates of the number of new mobile homes added to an area's housing stock were obtained from the Texas State Data Center's survey of building permits and demolitions. The sum of mobile homes from the survey was subtracted from the U.S. Bureau of the Census' estimate of the total number of mobile homes shipped to Texas. The difference was allocated to jurisdictions on the basis of the change in units in jurisdictions for other housing types from 2000 to the estimate date of July 1, 2002.

The average of the component-method II, ratio-correlation and housing- unit population estimates is used as the population estimate for July 1, 2002 with the total for all counties being controlled to the July 1, 2002 estimate for the State obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Prior to the release of these estimates, county estimates were evaluated for consistency and reasonableness by comparing them to those from other State and local agencies.

The January 1, 2003 estimates are obtained by adding births to, and subtracting deaths from July 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, to the July 1, 2002 estimates and assuming that July 1, 2001 to July 1, 2002 rates of migration continue from July 1, 2002 to January 1, 2003. The State and county estimates are obtained using the same method with the sum of the county estimates controlled to the State estimate.

Methodology for Place Estimates

For places, population estimates were made using the same three methods as used for county estimates. To complete the component-method II estimates for places for 2002, standard component procedures were applied to 2000 Census population counts for places. County-level birth and death data for 2000-02 from the Texas Department of Health and 2000-02 data from the Texas Education Agency on public school enrollment and from the Texas State Data Center survey of private schools on enrollment in private schools were used in this procedure. In addition, data on Medicare enrollment and on the net movement of persons from the military to the civilian population were obtained for counties from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Values for each of these items were allocated from counties to places prior to the completion of the place estimates. Such allocation procedures were necessary because data items that were available for places (such as birth and death data) showed year-to-year fluctuations and reporting errors that made the direct use of place-level data problematic. The general allocation procedures used for these items involved population subgroups closely associated with the item being allocated (i.e., women of child-bearing age for fertility, school-age population for school enrollment, the total population for deaths, persons 65+ years of age for Medicare enrollment, and the population 14-17 years of age for net movement). The number in the appropriate subgroups for each place and the remainder of the county in each county in 2000 were survived (using state-level survival rates for 1999-2000) to July 1, 2002, and the sum of the survived groups in each place and the remainder of the county were controlled to the county total for the item as reported from the appropriate agency to obtain the value for each place. Place estimates were completed for July 1, 2002 and adjusted to account for population changes due to annexations or other boundary changes as obtained from the annual Texas State Data Center Boundary and Annexation Survey.

The housing unit estimates for places were completed using the same general procedures delineated above (for counties) except that it was necessary to use procedures to allocate new housing units and demolitions to places that were not reporting jurisdictions. This was done by taking the difference between the county totals for new building permits and demolitions and the sum of values for places for which data were reported for a county and proportionally allocating the difference to the nonreporting places. For the 2002 estimates, the allocation was done on the basis of the nonreporting places' proportions of county housing stocks as reported in the 2000 Census.

The third method used is the ratio-correlation method. Ratio correlation estimates were made to allocate county populations to places (and non-place areas) using births, deaths and housing units for places as estimation items.

The estimates for place populations from component-method II and the housing-unit method were averaged to provide a July 1, 2002 estimate of the total population for each place. The sum of the estimated populations for places in each county (and for that part of each county's population not living in places) were controlled to county totals to ensure consistency with the county estimates.

The January 1, 2003 place estimates are prepared using the same extrapolative procedures as described above for the State and county. Place estimates for each county for January 1, 2003 are controlled to the county estimate for January 1, 2003.

Comparisons to U.S. Census Bureau Estimates

The estimates presented here differ from those from sources such as those periodically produced by the U.S. Census Bureau for several reasons. First, these estimates have been made using techniques that are different than those used by the Bureau. The Census Bureau uses only the administrative records method to estimate county and place populations. Because the administrative records method uses income tax data that are not available to analysts outside the Census Bureau, this technique could not be used by the Texas State Population Estimates Program. Secondly, the estimates reported in the following pages utilize more recent data than those used by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The Census Bureau's county estimates utilize 2001 birth and death data, whereas 2002 values were employed in the Texas State Data Center estimates reported here. Finally, the Census Bureau estimates do not include information on annexation and boundary changes for places later than 2000 whereas information through 2002 was included in the estimates completed by the Texas program. Because of these differences, the population estimates presented here and those from the U.S. Bureau of the Census are not directly comparable.

If you have any questions concerning these estimates, please contact:

Dr. Steve H. Murdock, State Demographer
Texas State Data Center
Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research
The University of Texas at San Antonio
One UTSA Circle
San Antonio, Texas 78249-0704
(210) 458-6543


Table 1
Texas State Data Center Population Estimates Program July 1, 2002 and January 1, 2003 Estimates of the Total Population of Counties and 2000-2002 and 2000-2003 Population Change for All Counties in Texas
               
  2000 July 1, 2002 January 1, 2003 Numerical Numerical Percent Percent
  Census Population Population Change Change Change Change
County Count Estimate Estimate 2000-02 2000-03 2000-02 2000-03
               
Anderson 55,109 55,658 56,006 549 897 1.0 1.6
Andrews 13,004 13,030 13,060 26 56 0.2 0.4
Angelina 80,130 81,501 81,728 1,371 1,598 1.7 2.0
Aransas 22,497 23,153 23,364 656 867 2.9 3.9
Archer 8,854 8,885 8,816 31 -38 0.4 -0.4
Armstrong 2,148 2,147 2,153 -1 5 0.0 0.2
Atascosa 38,628 40,355 40,667 1,727 2,039 4.5 5.3
Austin 23,590 25,182 25,801 1,592 2,211 6.7 9.4
Bailey 6,594 6,348 6,272 -246 -322 -3.7 -4.9
Bandera 17,645 18,976 19,401 1,331 1,756 7.5 10.0
Bastrop 57,733 63,471 64,207 5,738 6,474 9.9 11.2
Baylor 4,093 4,045 4,029 -48 -64 -1.2 -1.6
Bee 32,359 32,413 32,462 54 103 0.2 0.3
Bell 237,974 246,685 248,368 8,711 10,394 3.7 4.4
Bexar 1,392,931 1,442,244 1,456,490 49,313 63,559 3.5 4.6
Blanco 8,418 8,910 9,040 492 622 5.8 7.4
Borden 729 693 709 -36 -20 -4.9 -2.7
Bosque 17,204 17,595 17,632 391 428 2.3 2.5
Bowie 89,306 91,178 91,474 1,872 2,168 2.1 2.4
Brazoria 241,767 255,841 259,801 14,074 18,034 5.8 7.5
Brazos 152,415 160,406 162,787 7,991 10,372 5.2 6.8
Brewster 8,866 9,054 9,128 188 262 2.1 3.0
Briscoe 1,790 1,828 1,850 38 60 2.1 3.4
Brooks 7,976 7,806 7,793 -170 -183 -2.1 -2.3
Brown 37,674 38,584 38,872 910 1,198 2.4 3.2
Burleson 16,470 17,147 17,412 677 942 4.1 5.7
Burnet 34,147 36,210 36,583 2,063 2,436 6.0 7.1
Caldwell 32,194 34,358 34,897 2,164 2,703 6.7 8.4
Calhoun 20,647 20,974 21,158 327 511 1.6 2.5
Callahan 12,905 12,901 12,830 -4 -75 0.0 -0.6
Cameron 335,227 356,745 363,029 21,518 27,802 6.4 8.3
Camp 11,549 12,124 12,296 575 747 5.0 6.5
Carson 6,516 6,526 6,563 10 47 0.2 0.7
Cass 30,438 30,280 30,348 -158 -90 -0.5 -0.3
Castro 8,285 7,980 7,952 -305 -333 -3.7 -4.0
Chambers 26,031 28,395 29,079 2,364 3,048 9.1 11.7
Cherokee 46,659 47,651 47,883 992 1,224 2.1 2.6
Childress 7,688 7,641 7,599 -47 -89 -0.6 -1.2
Clay 11,006 11,366 11,577 360 571 3.3 5.2
Cochran 3,730 3,584 3,515 -146 -215 -3.9 -5.8
Coke 3,864 3,914 3,983 50 119 1.3 3.1
Coleman 9,235 8,919 8,798 -316 -437 -3.4 -4.7
Collin 491,675 565,338 579,373 73,663 87,698 15.0 17.8
Collingsworth 3,206 3,322 3,415 116 209 3.6 6.5
Colorado 20,390 20,927 21,073 537 683 2.6 3.3
Comal 78,021 84,226 85,514 6,205 7,493 8.0 9.6
Comanche 14,026 14,131 14,195 105 169 0.7 1.2
Concho 3,966 3,908 3,893 -58 -73 -1.5 -1.8
Cooke 36,363 37,619 37,883 1,256 1,520 3.5 4.2
Coryell 74,978 74,644 74,364 -334 -614 -0.4 -0.8
Cottle 1,904 1,806 1,812 -98 -92 -5.1 -4.8
Crane 3,996 3,722 3,692 -274 -304 -6.9 -7.6
Crockett 4,099 4,123 4,137 24 38 0.6 0.9
Crosby 7,072 6,881 6,823 -191 -249 -2.7 -3.5
Culberson 2,975 2,836 2,826 -139 -149 -4.7 -5.0
Dallam 6,222 6,255 6,344 33 122 0.5 2.0
Dallas 2,218,899 2,280,453 2,297,374 61,554 78,475 2.8 3.5
Dawson 14,985 14,361 14,135 -624 -850 -4.2 -5.7
Deaf Smith 18,561 18,294 18,283 -267 -278 -1.4 -1.5
Delta 5,327 5,385 5,384 58 57 1.1 1.1
Denton 432,976 490,753 503,555 57,777 70,579 13.3 16.3
De Witt 20,013 20,295 20,439 282 426 1.4 2.1
Dickens 2,762 2,753 2,751 -9 -11 -0.3 -0.4
Dimmit 10,248 10,074 10,025 -174 -223 -1.7 -2.2
Donley 3,828 3,786 3,820 -42 -8 -1.1 -0.2
Duval 13,120 13,027 12,979 -93 -141 -0.7 -1.1
Eastland 18,297 18,372 18,495 75 198 0.4 1.1
Ector 121,123 122,926 124,009 1,803 2,886 1.5 2.4
Edwards 2,162 2,098 2,085 -64 -77 -3.0 -3.6
Ellis 111,360 120,417 122,652 9,057 11,292 8.1 10.1
El Paso 679,622 699,557 705,459 19,935 25,837 2.9 3.8
Erath 33,001 33,176 33,196 175 195 0.5 0.6
Falls 18,576 18,616 18,679 40 103 0.2 0.6
Fannin 31,242 32,188 32,338 946 1,096 3.0 3.5
Fayette 21,804 22,550 22,635 746 831 3.4 3.8
Fisher 4,344 4,291 4,335 -53 -9 -1.2 -0.2
Floyd 7,771 7,544 7,489 -227 -282 -2.9 -3.6
Foard 1,622 1,557 1,551 -65 -71 -4.0 -4.4
Fort Bend 354,452 396,548 410,336 42,096 55,884 11.9 15.8
Franklin 9,458 9,305 9,192 -153 -266 -1.6 -2.8
Freestone 17,867 18,576 18,721 709 854 4.0 4.8
Frio 16,252 16,443 16,475 191 223 1.2 1.4
Gaines 14,467 14,458 14,530 -9 63 -0.1 0.4
Galveston 250,158 261,554 264,847 11,396 14,689 4.6 5.9
Garza 4,872 5,150 5,240 278 368 5.7 7.6
Gillespie 20,814 21,603 21,804 789 990 3.8 4.8
Glasscock 1,406 1,323 1,280 -83 -126 -5.9 -9.0
Goliad 6,928 7,161 7,188 233 260 3.4 3.8
Gonzales 18,628 19,154 19,302 526 674 2.8 3.6
Gray 22,744 22,484 22,449 -260 -295 -1.1 -1.3
Grayson 110,595 114,545 115,781 3,950 5,186 3.6 4.7
Gregg 111,379 113,406 113,899 2,027 2,520 1.8 2.3
Grimes 23,552 24,633 24,881 1,081 1,329 4.6 5.6
Guadalupe 89,023 95,569 97,221 6,546 8,198 7.4 9.2
Hale 36,602 36,085 35,918 -517 -684 -1.4 -1.9
Hall 3,782 3,769 3,752 -13 -30 -0.3 -0.8
Hamilton 8,229 8,284 8,294 55 65 0.7 0.8
Hansford 5,369 5,300 5,325 -69 -44 -1.3 -0.8
Hardeman 4,724 4,579 4,548 -145 -176 -3.1 -3.7
Hardin 48,073 48,974 49,118 901 1,045 1.9 2.2
Harris 3,400,578 3,540,965 3,582,772 140,387 182,194 4.1 5.4
Harrison 62,110 62,541 62,726 431 616 0.7 1.0
Hartley 5,537 5,466 5,374 -71 -163 -1.3 -2.9
Haskell 6,093 5,945 5,891 -148 -202 -2.4 -3.3
Hays 97,589 110,938 113,266 13,349 15,677 13.7 16.1
Hemphill 3,351 3,526 3,647 175 296 5.2 8.8
Henderson 73,277 75,502 75,925 2,225 2,648 3.0 3.6
Hidalgo 569,463 615,343 627,939 45,880 58,476 8.1 10.3
Hill 32,321 33,731 34,080 1,410 1,759 4.4 5.4
Hockley 22,716 22,533 22,605 -183 -111 -0.8 -0.5
Hood 41,100 43,774 44,543 2,674 3,443 6.5 8.4
Hopkins 31,960 32,538 32,877 578 917 1.8 2.9
Houston 23,185 23,444 23,528 259 343 1.1 1.5
Howard 33,627 33,910 33,934 283 307 0.8 0.9
Hudspeth 3,344 3,501 3,555 157 211 4.7 6.3
Hunt 76,596 79,877 80,683 3,281 4,087 4.3 5.3
Hutchinson 23,857 23,334 23,148 -523 -709 -2.2 -3.0
Irion 1,771 1,805 1,830 34 59 1.9 3.3
Jack 8,763 8,752 8,740 -11 -23 -0.1 -0.3
Jackson 14,391 14,679 14,812 288 421 2.0 2.9
Jasper 35,604 35,989 36,144 385 540 1.1 1.5
Jeff Davis 2,207 2,167 2,130 -40 -77 -1.8 -3.5
Jefferson 252,051 251,923 251,894 -128 -157 -0.1 -0.1
Jim Hogg 5,281 5,347 5,352 66 71 1.2 1.3
Jim Wells 39,326 40,186 40,390 860 1,064 2.2 2.7
Johnson 126,811 136,544 138,881 9,733 12,070 7.7 9.5
Jones 20,785 20,450 20,317 -335 -468 -1.6 -2.3
Karnes 15,446 15,583 15,708 137 262 0.9 1.7
Kaufman 71,313 78,519 80,042 7,206 8,729 10.1 12.2
Kendall 23,743 25,633 26,162 1,890 2,419 8.0 10.2
Kenedy 414 407 404 -7 -10 -1.7 -2.4
Kent 859 857 860 -2 1 -0.2 0.1
Kerr 43,653 44,752 44,984 1,099 1,331 2.5 3.0
Kimble 4,468 4,517 4,527 49 59 1.1 1.3
King 356 338 337 -18 -19 -5.1 -5.3
Kinney 3,379 3,471 3,508 92 129 2.7 3.8
Kleberg 31,549 31,343 31,276 -206 -273 -0.7 -0.9
Knox 4,253 4,201 4,263 -52 10 -1.2 0.2
Lamar 48,499 49,431 49,808 932 1,309 1.9 2.7
Lamb 14,709 14,719 14,691 10 -18 0.1 -0.1
Lampasas 17,762 18,905 19,192 1,143 1,430 6.4 8.1
La Salle 5,866 5,823 5,824 -43 -42 -0.7 -0.7
Lavaca 19,210 19,506 19,567 296 357 1.5 1.9
Lee 15,657 16,293 16,353 636 696 4.1 4.4
Leon 15,335 15,822 16,008 487 673 3.2 4.4
Liberty 70,154 74,152 74,957 3,998 4,803 5.7 6.8
Limestone 22,051 22,563 22,702 512 651 2.3 3.0
Lipscomb 3,057 3,010 3,021 -47 -36 -1.5 -1.2
Live Oak 12,309 12,322 12,327 13 18 0.1 0.1
Llano 17,044 18,012 18,303 968 1,259 5.7 7.4
Loving 67 65 65 -2 -2 -3.0 -3.0
Lubbock 242,628 247,334 248,636 4,706 6,008 1.9 2.5
Lynn 6,550 6,439 6,456 -111 -94 -1.7 -1.4
McCulloch 8,205 8,205 8,296 0 91 0.0 1.1
McLennan 213,517 217,826 219,065 4,309 5,548 2.0 2.6
McMullen 851 871 878 20 27 2.4 3.2
Madison 12,940 12,948 12,919 8 -21 0.1 -0.2
Marion 10,941 10,748 10,629 -193 -312 -1.8 -2.9
Martin 4,746 4,688 4,667 -58 -79 -1.2 -1.7
Mason 3,738 3,783 3,786 45 48 1.2 1.3
Matagorda 37,957 37,945 37,841 -12 -116 0.0 -0.3
Maverick 47,297 48,648 48,739 1,351 1,442 2.9 3.0
Medina 39,304 40,752 41,120 1,448 1,816 3.7 4.6
Menard 2,360 2,363 2,341 3 -19 0.1 -0.8
Midland 116,009 117,298 117,889 1,289 1,880 1.1 1.6
Milam 24,238 24,919 24,966 681 728 2.8 3.0
Mills 5,151 5,054 5,006 -97 -145 -1.9 -2.8
Mitchell 9,698 9,862 9,907 164 209 1.7 2.2
Montague 19,117 19,286 19,337 169 220 0.9 1.2
Montgomery 293,768 326,769 334,288 33,001 40,520 11.2 13.8
Moore 20,121 20,021 19,898 -100 -223 -0.5 -1.1
Morris 13,048 12,927 12,920 -121 -128 -0.9 -1.0
Motley 1,426 1,396 1,395 -30 -31 -2.1 -2.2
Nacogdoches 59,203 60,568 61,062 1,365 1,859 2.3 3.1
Navarro 45,124 46,727 47,014 1,603 1,890 3.6 4.2
Newton 15,072 15,018 15,002 -54 -70 -0.4 -0.5
Nolan 15,802 15,527 15,530 -275 -272 -1.7 -1.7
Nueces 313,645 315,290 315,662 1,645 2,017 0.5 0.6
Ochiltree 9,006 9,075 9,054 69 48 0.8 0.5
Oldham 2,185 2,203 2,240 18 55 0.8 2.5
Orange 84,966 85,536 85,836 570 870 0.7 1.0
Palo Pinto 27,026 27,418 27,450 392 424 1.5 1.6
Panola 22,756 22,777 22,868 21 112 0.1 0.5
Parker 88,495 96,579 98,843 8,084 10,348 9.1 11.7
Parmer 10,016 9,797 9,805 -219 -211 -2.2 -2.1
Pecos 16,809 16,373 16,280 -436 -529 -2.6 -3.1
Polk 41,133 42,794 43,133 1,661 2,000 4.0 4.9
Potter 113,546 115,231 115,704 1,685 2,158 1.5 1.9
Presidio 7,304 7,657 7,810 353 506 4.8 6.9
Rains 9,139 10,107 10,277 968 1,138 10.6 12.5
Randall 104,312 108,311 109,430 3,999 5,118 3.8 4.9
Reagan 3,326 3,238 3,259 -88 -67 -2.6 -2.0
Real 3,047 3,092 3,098 45 51 1.5 1.7
Red River 14,314 14,182 14,152 -132 -162 -0.9 -1.1
Reeves 13,137 12,804 12,807 -333 -330 -2.5 -2.5
Refugio 7,828 7,588 7,515 -240 -313 -3.1 -4.0
Roberts 887 849 846 -38 -41 -4.3 -4.6
Robertson 16,000 16,205 16,326 205 326 1.3 2.0
Rockwall 43,080 50,829 52,545 7,749 9,465 18.0 22.0
Runnels 11,495 11,349 11,298 -146 -197 -1.3 -1.7
Rusk 47,372 47,813 47,925 441 553 0.9 1.2
Sabine 10,469 10,413 10,459 -56 -10 -0.5 -0.1
San Augustine 8,946 9,169 9,264 223 318 2.5 3.6
San Jacinto 22,246 22,979 22,980 733 734 3.3 3.3
San Patricio 67,138 67,529 67,627 391 489 0.6 0.7
San Saba 6,186 6,298 6,279 112 93 1.8 1.5
Schleicher 2,935 2,908 2,878 -27 -57 -0.9 -1.9
Scurry 16,361 15,986 15,892 -375 -469 -2.3 -2.9
Shackelford 3,302 3,270 3,250 -32 -52 -1.0 -1.6
Shelby 25,224 25,586 25,740 362 516 1.4 2.0
Sherman 3,186 3,127 3,079 -59 -107 -1.9 -3.4
Smith 174,706 181,819 183,765 7,113 9,059 4.1 5.2
Somervell 6,809 7,451 7,645 642 836 9.4 12.3
Starr 53,597 56,167 56,997 2,570 3,400 4.8 6.3
Stephens 9,674 9,594 9,493 -80 -181 -0.8 -1.9
Sterling 1,393 1,329 1,290 -64 -103 -4.6 -7.4
Stonewall 1,693 1,562 1,498 -131 -195 -7.7 -11.5
Sutton 4,077 4,120 4,125 43 48 1.1 1.2
Swisher 8,378 8,089 7,924 -289 -454 -3.4 -5.4
Tarrant 1,446,219 1,526,403 1,546,877 80,184 100,658 5.5 7.0
Taylor 126,555 126,005 125,752 -550 -803 -0.4 -0.6
Terrell 1,081 947 911 -134 -170 -12.4 -15.7
Terry 12,761 12,322 12,264 -439 -497 -3.4 -3.9
Throckmorton 1,850 1,713 1,653 -137 -197 -7.4 -10.6
Titus 28,118 28,626 28,746 508 628 1.8 2.2
Tom Green 104,010 104,003 103,928 -7 -82 0.0 -0.1
Travis 812,280 839,946 842,826 27,666 30,546 3.4 3.8
Trinity 13,779 13,997 13,989 218 210 1.6 1.5
Tyler 20,871 20,798 20,799 -73 -72 -0.3 -0.3
Upshur 35,291 35,967 35,998 676 707 1.9 2.0
Upton 3,404 3,380 3,435 -24 31 -0.7 0.9
Uvalde 25,926 25,763 25,535 -163 -391 -0.6 -1.5
Val Verde 44,856 46,011 46,296 1,155 1,440 2.6 3.2
Van Zandt 48,140 50,212 50,725 2,072 2,585 4.3 5.4
Victoria 84,088 85,070 85,025 982 937 1.2 1.1
Walker 61,758 63,403 63,882 1,645 2,124 2.7 3.4
Waller 32,663 34,965 35,854 2,302 3,191 7.0 9.8
Ward 10,909 10,753 10,793 -156 -116 -1.4 -1.1
Washington 30,373 30,935 31,047 562 674 1.9 2.2
Webb 193,117 208,605 212,405 15,488 19,288 8.0 10.0
Wharton 41,188 41,914 42,145 726 957 1.8 2.3
Wheeler 5,284 5,091 5,061 -193 -223 -3.7 -4.2
Wichita 131,664 132,188 132,397 524 733 0.4 0.6
Wilbarger 14,676 14,282 14,187 -394 -489 -2.7 -3.3
Willacy 20,082 20,288 20,348 206 266 1.0 1.3
Williamson 249,967 283,654 290,355 33,687 40,388 13.5 16.2
Wilson 32,408 34,931 35,581 2,523 3,173 7.8 9.8
Winkler 7,173 6,989 6,957 -184 -216 -2.6 -3.0
Wise 48,793 51,664 52,303 2,871 3,510 5.9 7.2
Wood 36,752 38,274 38,714 1,522 1,962 4.1 5.3
Yoakum 7,322 7,193 7,164 -129 -158 -1.8 -2.2
Young 17,943 17,879 17,890 -64 -53 -0.4 -0.3
Zapata 12,182 13,016 13,236 834 1,054 6.8 8.7
Zavala 11,600 11,520 11,501 -80 -99 -0.7 -0.9
               
State of Texas 20,851,820 21,779,893 22,016,911 928,073 1,165,091 4.5 5.6


[Home]  [Contacts]  [Presentations]  [Site Map] [Subjects A to Z] [Search]
[Data]  [Map Products]  [Reference]  [Pubs & Reports]  [Services]  [TPEPP
Texas State Data Center and
Office of the State Demographer

Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research (IDSER)
College of Public Policy
The University of Texas at San Antonio
One UTSA Circle
San Antonio, Texas 78249-0704

http://www.txsdc.utsa.edu/tpepp/2002_txpopest_county.php
Texas State Data Center Copyright © 1998-2006
Website Statistics

(210) 458-6543
(210) 458-6541 Fax

Send info requests to txsdc@utsa.edu
Send website comments to the webmaster

Last modified on Oct 20, 2004

Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer